What are Others Saying
Local environmentalists say the pipeline is removing precious water that would otherwise flow
in Strawberry Creek and nourish the ecosystem. After nearly seven years of fighting against the
extraction of water, the activists hope California regulators will eventually order BlueTriton
Brands to drastically reduce their operation in the national forest. Amanda Frye, one of the
leading activists, believes that if all the springs were just allowed to naturally flow, there would be a lot
of water in the area. I agree with Amanda's position. A company should bear minimum
responsibility for the land that they are using to profit. In this situation, Nestle pays a $600
annual license fee to make billions off harming the land. Government officials should have the
power to step in and balance the power of such corporations.
California's State Water Resources Control Board has issued a draft Cease and Desist order
against Nestlé. The order is the culmination of a years-long battle between Nestlé and
environmentalists who say Nestlé has been taking water away from Strawberry Creek for next
to nothing under a permit that expired in 1987 as mentioned above. When asked about the
water sourcing issue; Nestle responded by saying, “Water is a very emotional issue”. This
response in my perspective is a very unsympathetic response to a sensitive issue that’s
undoubtedly affecting millions of people. I would have appreciated a more vulnerable approach
from them where they display some sort of humility for what they are doing. It seems as though
they have no morals.
Lastly, a resident in Michigan who has been there since 1969 mentioned that she “used to be
able to stand up here, and hear that creak run”, and that she has witnessed the water levels
decrease throughout the year due to Nestle sourcing their water. She said the fight for the rights
of water sourcing is a very big and important fight now with all that's happened in Flint Michigan.
I agree with this as Nestle has taken major advantage of two states both in need of their water
supply; Michigan and California.
Sources:
https://www.lamag.com/citythinkblog/nestle-water-california-legal-dispute/
https://www.latimes.com/environment/story/2022-01-20/environmentalists-fight-to-shut-down-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zk3sVrSyHCc&t=46s
With all the water shortages around the country, it's amazing to me that water is allowed to continue to be taken from areas that need it.
ReplyDeleteShocking, right! I mentioned it in my blog, but California has been struggling with some major fires recently. Image millions of gallons of water were not being taken from nature.
DeleteIt seems like there is an overwhelming disapproval from the public of Nestle's water practices. I found it very interesting how they described it as a "very emotional issue", especially considering how inconsiderate some of there business or ecological choices have been.
ReplyDeleteI agree that was very interesting.
Delete